A typical project begins with an approved, 200+ page BIM Execution Plan (BEP). Everyone assumes alignment. 

Then construction starts. 

Within weeks, field teams report structural interferences and mismatched prefab components. As site conflicts mount and rework costs rise, the field crew quietly sets aside the meticulously drafted BEP in favor of reactive problem-solving. 

The breakdown isn’t the documentation—it’s the transition to the job site. When a BEP functions merely as a contract compliance document, it separates from daily operations, forcing teams to gamble on data quality when fabrication begins. 

Why do models that are 100% clash-free in software still fail on the ground? This expert-driven session analyzes the operational gaps between design intent and field reality, introducing a framework to turn static PDFs into a dynamic execution system that site teams follow.